<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ZapakMail, is this a joke?</title>
	<link>http://tekchakra.com/2007/07/27/zapakmail-is-this-a-joke/</link>
	<description>The True Picture of the Internet &#038; Technology Wave in India. No BS.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: TekChakra &#187; Indiatimes re-launches web mail&#8230; a last ditch effort?</title>
		<link>http://tekchakra.com/2007/07/27/zapakmail-is-this-a-joke/#comment-19</link>
		<author>TekChakra &#187; Indiatimes re-launches web mail&#8230; a last ditch effort?</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 13:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tekchakra.com/2007/07/27/zapakmail-is-this-a-joke/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>[...] recently wrote about the ZapakMail venture being a terrible move and a very high cash burn for Reliance. It just didn&#8217;t make any sense, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] recently wrote about the ZapakMail venture being a terrible move and a very high cash burn for Reliance. It just didn&#8217;t make any sense, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vishal Lamba</title>
		<link>http://tekchakra.com/2007/07/27/zapakmail-is-this-a-joke/#comment-11</link>
		<author>Vishal Lamba</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tekchakra.com/2007/07/27/zapakmail-is-this-a-joke/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>OK. so I hopped over to Alexa and &lt;a HREF="http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?site0=icicibank.com&#038;site1=zapak.com&#038;site2=games2win.com&#038;site3=&#038;site4=&#038;y=r&#038;z=3&#038;h=300&#038;w=610&#038;range=6m&#038;size=Medium&#038;url=flashgot.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;Checked ICIC vs Zapak vs Games2win&lt;/A&gt;. If your claim of ICICI doing 6 million page views per day is accurate then - Zapak is doing 40% of that (based on the graph) - which is about 2.4 million, and Games2win is doing about 1 million. 

So, my estimate of Zapak doing 500,000 daily page views is wrong IF your claim of ICICIbank website gets 6 million page views is accurate. So, my question - where is this data from?

Also, Alexa counts multiple visits to the SAME page as ONE page view. (here's a snippent from their site - Page views measure the number of pages viewed by Alexa Toolbar users. Multiple page views of the same page made by the same user on the same day are counted only once. The page views per user numbers are the average numbers of unique pages viewed per user per day by the users visiting the site.)

So, my next insight is that if your 6 million figure is accurate - and is actual page views daily - even by same users to same page mulitiple number of times - then the 500,000 figure is correct. Why? Because your system of counting page views and that of Alexa's differs. Also, people on Zapak probably play and are hooked on to the &lt;B&gt;same game&lt;/B&gt;, thereby visiting the same page several times daily - thereby keeping the pageviews in Alexa's ranking at 500,000 (1/5th) of the estimate derived based on your 6 million figure... which I guess is accurate - as a player would probably visit / play the same game (page) about 5 times per day. Lost?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK. so I hopped over to Alexa and <a HREF="http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?site0=icicibank.com&#038;site1=zapak.com&#038;site2=games2win.com&#038;site3=&#038;site4=&#038;y=r&#038;z=3&#038;h=300&#038;w=610&#038;range=6m&#038;size=Medium&#038;url=flashgot.net" rel="nofollow">Checked ICIC vs Zapak vs Games2win</a>. If your claim of ICICI doing 6 million page views per day is accurate then - Zapak is doing 40% of that (based on the graph) - which is about 2.4 million, and Games2win is doing about 1 million. </p>
<p>So, my estimate of Zapak doing 500,000 daily page views is wrong IF your claim of ICICIbank website gets 6 million page views is accurate. So, my question - where is this data from?</p>
<p>Also, Alexa counts multiple visits to the SAME page as ONE page view. (here&#8217;s a snippent from their site - Page views measure the number of pages viewed by Alexa Toolbar users. Multiple page views of the same page made by the same user on the same day are counted only once. The page views per user numbers are the average numbers of unique pages viewed per user per day by the users visiting the site.)</p>
<p>So, my next insight is that if your 6 million figure is accurate - and is actual page views daily - even by same users to same page mulitiple number of times - then the 500,000 figure is correct. Why? Because your system of counting page views and that of Alexa&#8217;s differs. Also, people on Zapak probably play and are hooked on to the <b>same game</b>, thereby visiting the same page several times daily - thereby keeping the pageviews in Alexa&#8217;s ranking at 500,000 (1/5th) of the estimate derived based on your 6 million figure&#8230; which I guess is accurate - as a player would probably visit / play the same game (page) about 5 times per day. Lost?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramesh Bhandarkar</title>
		<link>http://tekchakra.com/2007/07/27/zapakmail-is-this-a-joke/#comment-6</link>
		<author>Ramesh Bhandarkar</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 02:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tekchakra.com/2007/07/27/zapakmail-is-this-a-joke/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Well I still dont know how you are calculating that. I work for ICICI and thier current Rank &#38; Zapak's current Rank in Alexa is similar. ICICI website get 6 million pageviews a day. I am not sure about games2win because Alexa shows huge difference between 2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I still dont know how you are calculating that. I work for ICICI and thier current Rank &amp; Zapak&#8217;s current Rank in Alexa is similar. ICICI website get 6 million pageviews a day. I am not sure about games2win because Alexa shows huge difference between 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://tekchakra.com/2007/07/27/zapakmail-is-this-a-joke/#comment-4</link>
		<author>admin</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 10:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tekchakra.com/2007/07/27/zapakmail-is-this-a-joke/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I disagree. A page rank of 23 in India on Alexa does not mean that much traffic. I calculate this based on a site that I own. I compare it to these sites and thats how I get my accurate figures. Games2win is doing about a little less than half as much as zapak.... which is around 250,000 page views daily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree. A page rank of 23 in India on Alexa does not mean that much traffic. I calculate this based on a site that I own. I compare it to these sites and thats how I get my accurate figures. Games2win is doing about a little less than half as much as zapak&#8230;. which is around 250,000 page views daily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramesh Bhandarkar</title>
		<link>http://tekchakra.com/2007/07/27/zapakmail-is-this-a-joke/#comment-3</link>
		<author>Ramesh Bhandarkar</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 08:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tekchakra.com/2007/07/27/zapakmail-is-this-a-joke/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>From where did u get thsi number of 500,000 PVs on Zapak. Their Alexa rank shows that they are no.23 in India which means they must be getting 3-4 million pageviews a day. Games2win must be getting close to 1-2 lakh PVs a day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From where did u get thsi number of 500,000 PVs on Zapak. Their Alexa rank shows that they are no.23 in India which means they must be getting 3-4 million pageviews a day. Games2win must be getting close to 1-2 lakh PVs a day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
